Elektrine lite

← Feed

@rafoix@lemmy.zip

2026-11-04 22:07 UTC

I looked it up. Shakur means thankful in Arabic according to the internet. AIPAC Shakur is a perfectly fitting name for Jeffries. It shows that he’s thankful and politically motivated by AIPAC because he has been bribed. Also, it’s weird to claim that a single family owns a word and therefore everyone using that word is insulting someone. I suggest you look up virtue signaling, vicarious offense-taking, and white knighting.

Replies (1)

  • @frisbird@lemmy.ml 2026-11-04 22:23

    So you missed the entire history of the contemporary black American Shakur family, where the name was adopted by Black Panther James Coston as part of his conversion to Islam after Malcolm X’s assassination? Where that others in the Panthers choose to adopt that name for themselves as a sign of solidarity, respect, and commitment to black liberation? Where Tupac’s mother changed her name for this reason, and changed her son’s name as well. The only thing linking Jeffries’s moniker and the Shakur family name is that AIPAC and Tupac end in the same three letters. It both assigns a very specific radical revolutionary name to an opponent, which in and of itself is disrespectful to the name and the family, but then does so simply because Jeffries is black, because none of the white people in Congress that take money from AIPAC are called “AIPAC Shakur”. There’s really not a single legitimate reason to use the moniker, and there are at least 2 reasons not to. To be clear, Jeffries deserve an insult. Using Shakur as part of the insult is insulting to the Shakurs. Jeffries has not earned that name.

    Open ##5522177